Count Us Out

Eric Holder’s Close Friend Joins Roman Polanski’s Legal Team

“Hollyweird’ Comes to Defense of Pedophile Rapist Polanski

By
Reginald Orem

Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein called it a “so-called” crime. Actress Whoopi Goldberg says she knows it wasn’t “rape rape.” It was something else, but not “rape rape.”

French celebrity intellectual Bernard-Henri Levy says perhaps the individual has committed a “youthful error.” Who were they talking about and what had he done? In 1977 film director Roman Polanski, then 43, lured a 13-year-old ninth grader to a house borrowed from actor Jack Nicholson.

Polanski plied her with champagne, drugged her with Quaalude (a strong depressant) photographed her naked in a hot tub, then turned on her.

Ignoring her frightened pleas, he raped and sodomized her. The assault included oral sex. A transcript of the victim’s testimony before a grand jury is now available for anyone to see.

Found guilty of the rape charge, Polanski fled the United States in 1978 to France prior to sentencing. For over 30 years he lived a life of “gilded luxury” as Washington Post writer Eugene Robinson put it, traveling to Israel and other countries.

Flouting American authorities once too often, he was finally nabbed in Zurich, Switzerland and jailed to await extradition to the U.S. One wonders if perhaps this cocky, strutting little Euro-swinger has lost some of his swagger.

His arrest has caused a tidal wave of dismay and fury by the shocked international glitterati. French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouhner described the arrest as “sinister.” Culture Minister Frederic Mitterand labels America as “scary.”

In this country, the outrage over Polanski’s capture was predictably vitriolic Hollywood. How dare the “great artist” be held in any way accountable for his moral and criminal transgressions?

Harvey Weinstein circulated a 100-name pro-Polanski petition, and proclaimed “Hollywood has the best moral compass.”

Terry Teachout, writing in the Wall Street Journal, disagrees. “The rush to support Polanski shows how isolated the entertainment industry is from the rest of the world.”

He dismisses Weinstein as a “moral idiot.” Katha Pollitt, writing in Nation magazine opines:

“The widespread support for Polanski shows the liberal cultural elite at its preening, fatuous worst. No wonder Middle America hates them.”

In “Hollywood Shows Its True Colors,” Rich Lowry sums up the Tinseltown ethic: “Rarely has a class of people mustered a more damning indictment of its own putrid decadence.”

Jeff Berg, Polanski’s agent, says Roman is “now in a fighting mood,” and will of course, fight extradition to the U.S. However, legal experts say there is little to fight.

“This is the rape and sodomization of a 13-year-old child—someone who admitted it and skipped out,” says Carol Chase, law professor at Pepperdine University. Polanski, now 76, has added well-known Washington power lawyer Reid Weingarten to his legal team. Weingarten is a close friend and associate of Attorney General Eric Holder, Jr.

CONTINUED HERE.

November 2, 2009 - Posted by count us out | Uncategorized | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

2 Comments »

  1. You are really largeing it here arn’t you! Full-on showoff stuff. Samantha Geimer was sexually experienced, made up by her mother to look 21, and she and her mother were on the make. Angelica Houston was even in the house when the sex took place. There were no physical injuries or signs of forcible sex (according to court papers) when Samantha was examined.

    An ordinary 13 year old girl, “lured” to her fate, this was not. Correct behaviour by either of them (or Samantha Geimer’s mother) it was not. Why was Samantha’s mother not on a charge!?

    Learn some judgment that is not billboard, Disney-cartoon-style over-reaction ( even if that is what redneck America is all about). Can America really not make distinctions and not let killers out of jail without a thought but cry for the blood of Polanski in the next breath? Do please grow up.

    Comment by Tallulah | November 7, 2009

  2. Roman Polanski’s life spanning 76 years – gives us all an example of how a bad Government takes away liberty, and then how freedom can be won -then lost over time.

    Roman Polanski by necessity ran away from a very bad government early on in his life, his father told him to, and if not – he would surely – have perished like his mother and sibling did.

    Decades later Roman Polanski faced another bad government in the Santa Monica Courthouse, California.

    Crime or no crime, County of Los Angeles Judge Laurence J. Rittenband was about to RAILROAD Roman Polanski into involuntary deportation through threatening him with indeterminate prison time – despite the fact that Roman Polanski had already served the original non-appealable prison term. And no further prison time had been recommended.

    When it became clear to Roman Polanski that the Santa Monica Judge was about to break his promise, and that he wanted to take Polanski’s freedom away again for an indeterminate time…until he agreed to deportation, Polanski had no other alternative but to flee. Polanski did not flee from punishment – he was fleeing unjust punishment.

    Running away from danger and unjust punishment, was a necessity that started early on in Roman Polanski’s life.

    Regardless of which side of the Atlantic – running away from DANGER & INJUSTICE became his MOTIF – HIS ROSEBUD

    Comment by S Naille | November 21, 2009


Leave a comment